Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 F.3d 579 - U.S. v. Ganzer

U.S. v. Ganzer’s Empirical Analysis

922 F.3d 579 · 2019

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
August 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Stone v. Powell · Herring v. United States · Illinois v. Krull

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “construe the government's efforts to have Rule 41(b) amended to specifically allow for warrants like the NIT warrant as an admission that such warrants were not previously allowed, but rather as an attempt to clarify an existing law's application to new circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] magistrate judge with authority in any district where activities related to a crime may have occurred has authority to issue a warrant to use remote access to search electronic storage media and to seize or copy electronically stored information located within or outside that district if ... the district where the media or information is located has been concealed through technological means ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the computer's IP address and when the NIT determined [it]; a unique identifier for the computer generated by the NIT; the type of operating system used by the computer and the operating system's active username ...; the computer's host name; and the computer's media access control,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.