Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 F.3d 737 - Edmonds v. Smith

Edmonds v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

922 F.3d 737 · 2019

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Montana v. United States · Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp. · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Arizona v. California · Taylor v. Sturgell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not a subsequent stage of the underlying criminal proceedings; it is a separate civil case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.