Goudy v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 834 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Anderson v. Creighton · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is a 'reasonable probability' that the result would have been different had the suppressed evidence been put before the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the evidence was not otherwise available to the defendant through the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.