Davis v. Morris-Walker, LTD’s Empirical Analysis
922 F.3d 868 · 2019
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Foman v. Davis · 133 S. Ct. 721 - Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. · Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. · Steger v. Franco, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not premised on the plaintiff's level of knowledge about alleged violations or her interests in making a future entry; it turned on whether the plaintiff had suffered injury by encountering a violation inside the restaurant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A defendant's voluntary compliance with a plaintiff's demands will moot a case if the defendant shows that 'it is absolutely clear the allegedly wrongful behavior could not reasonably be expected to recur.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Davis cannot use the violation encountered in the parking space to expand her standing to sue for unencountered violations inside the [restaurant] that never injured her.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.