Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 FSUPP 689 - Weiler v. Shalala

Weiler v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
August 2019
most recently cited

13 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2019

13 district ·

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 428 (§ 228 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Goodermote v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human Services · Mcdonald v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[f]ailure of the [ALJ] to apply the correct legal standards as promulgated by the regulations or failure to provide the reviewing court with the sufficient basis to determine that the [ALJ] applied the correct legal standards are grounds for reversal.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “) with 26 U.S.C. § 6511 (h)(2)(A) ("an individual is financially disabled if such individual is unable to manage his financial affairs by reason of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment of the individual which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months. ") (emphasis added). So, to the extent the goal underlying Revenue Procedure 99-21 was to implement a disability-determination process based on principles consistent with those of the SSA, the interpretation of "physician”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “acceptable medical source who provides [the claimant] with medical treatment or evaluation and who has, or has had, an ongoing treatment relationship with [the claimant].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.