Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 FSUPP 902 - Mayer v. Wing

Mayer v. Wing’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2018

1 district ·

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1396 (§ 1900 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Allen v. Wright · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Carnegie v. United States · United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Capricious action in a legal sense is established when an administrative agency on identical facts decides differently.”) (quotation and citation omitted). . Mayer, 922 F.Supp. at 911 . Accord Holmes v. New York City Housing Authority, 398 F.2d 262, 265 (2d Cir.1968) (Housing Authority may not arbitrarily decide, with neither standards nor a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he administrative appeal process is not a substitute for proper prior procedures at the agency level ... [and that] the administrative appeal process may not regularly be used as a vehicle to conduct a requisite inquiry which the agency continually fails to institute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he fact that none of the Plaintiffs was experiencing a reduction of services on the date the complaint was filed is of no moment,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.