Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 N.E.2d 605 - Dowell v. State

Dowell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2107

Relies on Houston v. Lack · Corcoran v. State · United States v. Craig · Marlett v. State · Indianapolis Machinery Co. v. Bollman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prisoners cannot personally travel to the courthouse to see that the notice is stamped 'filed' or to establish the date on which the court received the notice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a pro se incarcerated litigant who delivers a [document] to prison officials for mailing on or before its due date accomplishes a timely filing”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reasonable, legitimate, and verifiable documentation supporting a claim that a document was timely submitted to prison officials for mailing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.