922 So. 2d 1 - Lawrence v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 669 So. 2d 56 - Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. v. Berry · 641 So. 2d 20 - Tharp v. Bunge Corp. · Downs v. Choo · 786 So. 2d 390 - Williamson Ex Rel. Williamson v. Keith · 650 So. 2d 1347 - Tate v. Southern Jitney Jungle Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fulton was injured on a remote part of the business premises (the parking lot), and that his fall was due solely to his own actions in walking on snow and ice, a God-made condition of which he was fully aware. Thus, the court determined that, as a matter of law, it was enough that Fulton was injured in the parking lot, that is a remote part of the business, rather than, as in Good,win, in a designated walkway or covered area that was immediately adjacent to and directly connected to the businesses] entrance or exit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.