Grubb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 89 - Maddox v. State · 668 So. 2d 589 - State v. Hart · 761 So. 2d 1015 - Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800 · 688 So. 2d 909 - Brock v. State · Russman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"a defendant has the opportunity to interpose a substantive objection to probation conditions contained in the written order even if no contemporaneous objection is made at the sentencing proceedings. Therefore, procedural due process is satisfied without the need to orally pronounce otherwise proper special probation conditions."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.