Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

922 So. 2d 404

Docket No. 4D05-4538.

Martone v. State

Thomas MARTONE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-03-08

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 2009

3 state decisions

Relies on 661 So. 2d 134 - Saunders v. State · Cuevas v. State · Johnson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patrick C. Rastatter of Glass & Rastatter, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellant.

¶2Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We reverse the order denying appellant's Florida Rule of Criminal procedure 3.800(a) motion. The trial court failed to attach portions of the record conclusively refuting appellant's legally sufficient claim. Goldbach v. State,906 So.2d 349 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Torres v. State,830 So.2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Johnson v. State,665 So.2d 380 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Thomas v. State,667 So.2d 440 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

¶5The state's attempt to provide such record evidence for the first time in this appeal is improper. Cuevas v. State,907 So.2d 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Saunders v. State,661 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

¶6We remand for the trial court to attach portions of the record that conclusively refute the appellant's claim or to grant appropriate relief.

¶7GUNTHER, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

/922/so2d/404 · .json · Public domain