922 So. 2d 637 - Hover v. Farber’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. · Ziegler v. Bagby Construction/LWCC · 761 So. 2d 84 - Nuccio v. Robert · 815 So. 2d 245 - Prince v. K-Mart Corp. · 848 So. 2d 740 - BD. OF DIR. OF IND. DEV. v. All Taxpayers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Court of Appeal is a court of record, which must limit its review to evidence in the record before it. An appellate court cannot review evidence that is not in the record on appeal and cannot receive new evidence. A written motion for summary judgment is a "pleading" under La. C.C.P. art. 852, and written documents may be attached to pleadings and made part thereof. [Citations omitted.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.