Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 922 So. 2d 802 - Bush v. State

922 So. 2d 802 - Bush v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Sellers v. Sanders · 574 So. 2d 685 - McQuarter v. State · 806 So. 2d 1148 - Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “knowingly and intelligently concluded that his best interests require entry of the guilty plea.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Bush is correct that a plea of nolo con-tendere is inapplicable in felony cases. However, the record indicates that Bush did not enter a plea of nolo contendere. Instead, the record shows that Bush entered a valid plea of guilty often referred to as an Alford plea in recognition of the holding by the Supreme Court in North Carolina v. Alford.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The trial court's denial will not be reversed absent a finding that the trial court's decision was clearly erroneous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.