Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

922 S.W.2d 18

Naumann v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1996

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1996-03-26

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2004

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-03-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Defendant pled guilty to felony stealing, § 570.030, RSMo 1994. Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court sentenced him as a persistent offender to ten years imprisonment. It then suspended execution and placed him on probation. Later, that probation was revoked.

¶2Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4The motion court’s judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/922/sw2d/18 · .json · Public domain