Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 F.2d 76 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

923 F.2d 76 · 1991

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably United States v. Rice (2006), United States v. Richards (1992)

22 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

210199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · United States v. Jones · United States v. Adkins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the Manual of Model Criminal Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit ..., it is stated that `the Committee believes that in most cases the word "knowingly”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]n indictment is not fatally defective, though it fails to allege felonious intent, if its wording parallels the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “does not need to be defined.' Clearly, it was not plain error to omit such a definition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.