Matias v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
923 F.2d 821 · 1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Overall Roofing & Construction Inc. v. United States (1991), Quality Tooling, Inc. v. United States (1995)
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 866 · 10 U.S.C. § 867 · 10 U.S.C. § 876 · 10 U.S.C. § 881 · 28 U.S.C. § 1259 · 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Relies on United States v. Fausto · Burns v. Wilson · Schlesinger v. Councilman · Penson v. Ohio · United States v. Augenblick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“demonstrate convincingly that in the court-martial proceedings there has been such a deprivation of fundamental fairness as to impair due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“those issues that address the fundamental fairness in military proceedings and the constitutional guarantees of due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“full and fair consideration to each of [his] claims in proceedings that satisfied the requirements of due process of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.