Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

923 F.2d 848

Docket No. 90-6152.

Marteny v. Murray P

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • John Clinton MARTENYv.Edward MURRAY, William P
  • Rogers, Toniv.Bair, James E. Johnson, Charles E. Thompson, Oscar Gulmatico, Dr., William Henceroth, Dr

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 7, 1991. Decided Jan. 29, 1991. Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1991.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on In Re Christopher Fekos, Peter Fekos, in Re Christopher Fekos, Peter Fekos

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-02-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-89-71-R)

John Clinton Marteny, appellant pro se.

Eric Karl Gould Fiske, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

John Clinton Marteny appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Marteny's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Marteny v. Murray, CA-89-71-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 21, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/923/f2d/848 · .json · Public domain