Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

923 F.2d 849

Docket No. 90-6685.

United States v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 7, 1991. Decided Jan. 22, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Feb. 22, 1991.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-22

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Morgan Lee Sprigg, III v. Commissioners of Public Service Commission, Darrell Hardman, D/B/A Hardman's Seventh Street Exxon

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-02-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-76-42; CA-90-571-CIV-5)

Allen Ray Johnson, appellant pro se.

Margaret Person Currin, United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Allen Ray Johnson appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson, CR-76-42; CA-90-571-CIV-5 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/923/f2d/849 · .json · Public domain