Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 F.3d 255 - Luceus v. Rhode Island

Luceus v. Rhode Island’s Empirical Analysis

923 F.3d 255 · 2019

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2024
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Ricci v. DeStefano · LeBlanc v. Great American Insurance · Kosereis v. Rhode Island

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the reasons offered by [Bentley] were a pretext for discrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “establish a prima facie case by showing that (1) she is 'a member of a protected class'; (2) she - 14 - is 'qualified' for the job [from which she claims she was constructively discharged]; (3) she has 'suffer[ed] an adverse employment action at the hands of her employer'; and (4) there is 'some evidence of a causal connection between her membership in a protected class and the adverse employment action.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Cham v. Station Operators, Inc., 685 F.3d 87, 94 (1st Cir. 2012). While”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.