923 F. Supp. 2d 931 - Munoz v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 124 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 11602 · 42 U.S.C. § 11603 · 42 U.S.C. § 11607
Relies on Abbott v. Abbott · Friedrich v. Friedrich · Mozes v. Mozes · Nunez-Escudero v. Tice-Menley · John Walsh Jacqueline Walsh and Martha Miller Intervenor John Walsh Jacqueline Walsh and Martha Miller Intervenor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'convincing written renunciation of rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.