Whitfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
27 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ake v. Oklahoma · Simmons v. South Carolina · 727 So. 2d 216 - Rutherford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause the Strickland standard requires establishment of both [deficient performance and prejudice] prongs, when a defendant fails to make a showing as to one prong, it is not necessary to delve into whether he has made a showing as to the other prong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evans v. State · Preston v. State“[s]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance if alternative courses of action have been considered and rejected.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel is not required to present cumulative evidence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.