Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 SO2D 375 - Whitfield v. State

Whitfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Ake v. Oklahoma · Simmons v. South Carolina · 727 So. 2d 216 - Rutherford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]ecause the Strickland standard requires establishment of both [deficient performance and prejudice] prongs, when a defendant fails to make a showing as to one prong, it is not necessary to delve into whether he has made a showing as to the other prong.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[s]trategic decisions do not constitute ineffective assistance if alternative courses of action have been considered and rejected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “counsel is not required to present cumulative evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.