923 So. 2d 419 - Suggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 34 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “This Court applies a mixed standard of review to Giglio claims, `defer[ring] to the factual findings made by the trial court to the extent they are supported by competent, substantial evidence, but review[ing] de novo'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Guzman v. State · 965 So. 2d 38 - Dailey v. State

2. “Although it is plain that Suggs and Byars had interests adverse to each other, Suggs' postconviction motion failed to allege that his attorney took any action furthering the interests of Byars that prejudiced Suggs. . . . Petitioner fails to allege a connection between the conflict of interest and a specific deficiency that prejudiced him.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 944 So. 2d 270 - Sliney v. State

3. “To establish a Giglio violation, one must show that `(1) some testimony at trial was false; (2) the prosecutor knew that testimony was false; and (3) the testimony was material.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Davis v. State