Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

923 So. 2d 596

Neal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2006-03-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2011

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We deny Harry Neal’s petition for belated appeal. While Neal’s petition included an unnotarized oath, he failed to execute it. Our dismissal is without prejudice so that Neal may file a timely and properly sworn petition.

¶2PETITION DENIED.

SHARP, W., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
/923/so2d/596 · .json · Public domain