Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 SO2D 763 - State v. Hawkins

State v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mims · 839 So. 2d 214 - State v. Pham · 729 So. 2d 743 - State v. Smiley · 744 So. 2d 160 - State v. Harris · State v. Hoye

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Nothing in the record evidences that Ms. Hawkins was behaving in an irrational manner, was incapable of discerning what the officers were asking of her or that they had received any reports regarding an intoxicated person walking along the sidewalk or in the middle of Newton Street. The officers never indicated that Ms. Hawkins was weaving into the street, nor was there any indication that there were other persons in the area who might have been disturbed by her presence in an intoxicated state. In the absences of such evidence, in light of the fact that neither of the police officers who observed Ms. Hawkins that night testified that they felt she was a danger to herself and based upon the testimony of Officer Burton that Ms. Hawkins was arrested because they felt she was a danger to the public, we cannot say that her mere intoxication was sufficient to warrant an arrest. According to the municipal statute and Smiley , mere intoxication, is not enough to justify an arrest for public intoxication, unless the subjects were either a danger to themselves or others, or would disturb the peace.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is unlawful for any person to appear in a public place manifestly under the influence of alcohol, narcotics or other drugs, not therapeutically administered, to the degree that he may endanger himself or other persons or property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.