Levine v. Hans’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2016
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on King General Contractors, Inc. v. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints · 109 Cal. App. 2d 917 - Baratti v. Baratti · Cotleur v. Danziger · Hamm v. Hamm · Perkins v. Sykes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (3) the judgment is irregular; (4) the judgment is void; or (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment remain in force.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mullins v. Mullins“Res judi-cata generally will not bar a claim which the claimant had no opportunity to bring in the prior proceeding.” Levine v. Hans, 923 S.W.2d 357, 362 (Mo.App.1996). 12 . The court's docket sheets reflect that it took the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the surprise must be something unexpected, as to which the party is free of neglect or lack of prudence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.