Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 SW2D 455 - Beatty v. Conner

Beatty v. Conner’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2010

10 state decisions

80199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ralston Purina Co. v. King · 231 Mo. App. 469 - Gilbert v. Malan · Burris v. Terminal RR Ass'n · Jeffries v. Jeffries · Fulkerson v. Laird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon the fifing of the interrogatories aforesaid, the garnishee shall exhibit and file his answer thereto, on oath, within six days thereafter, if the term shall so long continue, if not, during such term, unless for good cause shown the court shall order otherwise. In default of such answer, the plaintiff may take judgment by default against him, or the court may, upon motion, compel him to answer by attachment of his body; provided, in all cases where the garnishee is a corporation and fails to answer as above provided, the court may, upon motion, compel said corporation to answer by attaching the body of the president, secretary, treasurer, auditor, paymaster or deputy paymaster of such corporation, in which case the said corporation shall be liable for all the costs accruing by reason of such attachment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Such judgment by default may be proceeded on to final judgment, in like manner as in case of defendants in other civil actions; but no final judgment hall be rendered against the garnishee until there shall be final judgment against the defendant, and in no case for a greater amount than the amount sworn to by the plaintiff, with interest and costs, or for a greater amount than the garnishee shall appear to be liable for to the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The rule reaches only procedural errors which, if known, would have prevented entry of a judgment.’ ” Id. 5 . Section 512.160.1, RSMo 1994, reads as follows: Apart from questions of jurisdiction of the trial court over the subject matter and questions as to the sufficiency of pleadings to state a claim upon which relief can be granted or a legal defense to a claim, no ' allegations of error shall be considered in any civil appeal except such as have been presented to or expressly decided by the trial court. § 512.160.1, RSMo 1994. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994. 6 . Pleadings”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.