State v. Nunley’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 71 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 87 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably State v. Chaney (1998), State v. Taylor (1996)
5 federal appellate · 71 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Soberon v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · Ohio v. Kentucky · Delaware v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 87 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the party against whom collateral estoppel is asserted [must] have [had] a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior suit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Judgment vacated. Cause remanded for new penalty hearing, imposition of sentence, and entry of new judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he doctrine applies only to those issues that were necessarily and unambiguously decided.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.