Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 923 SW2D 98 - Hatch v. State

Hatch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 1998
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Marin v. State · Ex Parte Hernandez · 68 Tex. Crim. 539 - MacKey and Grice v. State · 52 Tex. Crim. 303 - Jones v. State · Kinser v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Not less than twelve jurors can render and return a verdict in a felony ease. It must be concurred in by each juror and signed by the foreman. Except as provided in Subsection (b) of this section, however, when pending the trial of any felony case, one juror may die or be disabled from sitting at any time before the charge of the court is read to the jury, the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict; but when the verdict shall be rendered by less than the whole number, it shall be signed by every member of the jury concurring in it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.