Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 F.2d 1018 - Karr v. Commissioner

Karr v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
July 2016
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently July 2016 · most notably ACM Partnership v. Commissioner (1998), Krause v. Commissioner (1992)

35 federal appellate · 1 district ·

690199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 174 · 26 U.S.C. § 6621

Relies on Knetsch v. United States · Brannen v. Commissioner · Rice's Toyota World, Inc. v. Commissioner · Beck v. Commissioner · Rose v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Secretary may waive all or part of the addition to tax provided by [the substantial understatement of liability] section on a showing by the taxpayer that there was reasonable cause for the understatement (or part thereof) and that the taxpayer acted in good faith.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an examination of the substance of the transactions to determine whether those transactions had any practicable economic effect other than the creation of tax benefits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.