Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

924 F.2d 1052

Docket Nos. 90-6660, 90-6679.

Aaron Holsey v. Harry v. Smith, Individually and as a Maryland State Trooper With the Barracks Located at Hagerstown, Maryland, Aaron Holsey v. Harry v. Smith, Individually and as a Maryland State Trooper With the Barracks Located at Hagerstown, Maryland

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Aaron HOLSEYv.Harry V. SMITH, individually and as a Maryland State Trooper with the Barracks located at Hagerstown, Maryland
  • Aaron HOLSEYv.Harry V. SMITH, individually and as a Maryland State Trooper with the Barracks located at Hagerstown, Maryland

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 10, 1990. Decided Feb. 4, 1991.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-04

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Min-Chuan Ku v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-02-04

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-83-122-K)

Aaron Holsey, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., Millicent Edwards Gordon, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Pikesville, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In these consolidated cases, Aaron Holsey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.* Our review of the record, the district court's opinion, and the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holsey v. Smith, CA-83-122-K (D.Md. Aug. 2, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

Holsey filed two notices of appeal from the same final order

/924/f2d/1052 · .json · Public domain