Taggart v. Time Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
924 F.2d 43 · 1991
Citation profile
76 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 196 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Ltd. Partnership (1994), Tomka v. Seiler Corp. (1995)
76 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 621 (§ 2 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Dister v. Continental Group, Inc. · Montana v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n · Petrusch v. Teamsters Local 317
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Only when no reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the nonmoving party should summary judgment be granted.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we apply the same standard as the district court did in deciding the Rule 56 motion and determine de novo whether a genuine issue as to any material fact exists”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]ll inferences to be drawn from the materials submitted in the trial court are viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.