State of New York Stein v. Secretary of Health and Human Services’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2010
5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Schisler v. Bowen · National Labor Relations Board. v. Welcome-American Fertilizer Co. · International House v. National Labor Relations Board · Goodman v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are not prepared at this time to pass judgment upon the district court’s holding that the case can be disposed of by applying the treating physician rule that is used in social security disability cases.... We believe it better practice to have the Secretary first advise us what role if any the attending physician rule played in the instant case and will play in future cases of this nature.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a rule sets forth specific criteria, as HCFAR 85-2 does, the Secretary's determination must contain an application of the criteria to the particular facts of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holland v. Sullivan“[c]lose medical supervision by a physician with specialized training or experience in rehabilitation,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holland v. Sullivan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.