Clark v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
924 F.2d 550 · 1991
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2012
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc Soler Chrysler-Plymouth Inc · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Wilko v. Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]ailure to take an authorized appeal from an interlocutory order does not preclude raising the question on appeal from the final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.