Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 F.2d 568 - Munn v. Algee

Munn v. Algee’s Empirical Analysis

924 F.2d 568 · 1991

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably 194 W. Va. 97 - Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc. (1995), United States v. O'Keefe (1997)

46 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

4401991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Kotteakos v. United States · McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher · Employment Division Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. L Smith · Texas v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 103 is silent as to what factors a court must consider in determining whether substantial rights have been affected, indicating that the court must proceed on a case to case basis rather than apply a mechanical rule.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Manville Sales Corp. · Munn v. Algee
  2. “[C]ourts of appeals should not reverse on the basis of erroneous evidentiary rulings unless a party's 'substantial right' is affected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Manville Sales Corp. · Munn v. Algee
  3. “[W]hen the district court's ruling is predicated on its view of a question of law, it is subject to de novo review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. David Rice v. Community Health Association · Mongrue v. Monsanto Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.