Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 F.2d 612 - United States v. Robison

United States v. Robison’s Empirical Analysis

924 F.2d 612 · 1991

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

37 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably United States v. Phibbs (1993), United States v. Wells (2000)

37 federal appellate ·

4001991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · LaBranche v. United States Olympic Committee · United States v. Harvey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]lea agreements are contractual in nature. In interpreting and enforcing them, we are to use traditional principles of contract law.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'As a general rule, fundamental fairness means that the courts will enforce promises made during the plea bargaining process that induce a criminal defendant to waive his constitutional rights and plead guilty.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is a question of fact to be resolved by the district court. Those findings are reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard on appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.