Jackson v. Brennan’s Empirical Analysis
924 F.2d 725 · 1991
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2014
12 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Reiter v. Sonotone Corp. · In re Disbarment of Gonzales · Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson Corp · Chua Han Mow v. United States · United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Commonly Known as 916 Douglas Avenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]bsent clear intent to have [the] defendant's [federal] sentence run concurrently with any state sentence, the execution of his federal sentence did not begin to run until the United States Marshal assumed custody over him at his place of detention to await transportation to the federal penitentiary.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“(Report and Recommendation at 3.) Neither does a review of the record reveal the reason or even the court that made this decision 2 The order mandates that the Parole Commission prepare a list of approximately 50 volunteer prisoners with federal detainers according to criteria agreed upon by the court, the plaintiffs, the United States Bureau of Prisons and the Maryland Parole Commission. The transfer would occur once the list had been approved by the court and a transfer order entered 3 Day claims that he”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Section] 3568 does not require that the federal prison system give [a prisoner] credit for his [non-federal] custody [when] that custody was pursuant to the laws of, and under the complete control of, a sovereign other than the federal government.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.