Derrick v. Rs Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
924 F.2d 813 · 1990
Citation profile
93 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 171 later decisions — most recently September 2017 · most notably Collazo v. Estelle (1991), United States v. Bautista-Avila (1993)
93 federal appellate · 8 district · 12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Colorado v. Connelly · Malloy v. Hogan · Carnegie v. United States · Moran v. Burbine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 171 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether, considering the totality of the circumstances, the government obtained the statement by physical or psychological coercion or by improper inducement so that the suspect's will was overborne.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[C]oercive police activity is a necessary predicate to finding that a confession is not 'voluntary' within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“with a full awareness of both the nature of the right being abandoned and the consequences of the decision to abandon it.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.