United States v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis
924 F.3d 467 · 2019
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583
Relies on Gall v. United States · Rita v. United States · Sells v. United States · Packingham v. North Carolina · United States v. Stults
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with Carson that the district court plainly erred by failing to make any effort to support the challenged conditions (or any other special condition) with individualized findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where the basis for an imposed condition is sufficiently evident and can be discerned from the record, reversal is not required by a lack of individualized findings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must still show the error affected his substantial rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.