Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

924 N.W.2d 87

State v. Gomez

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2019

North Dakota Supreme Court · decided 2019-03-13

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2025

13 state decisions

Relies on State v. Causer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2019-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1[¶1] Joshua John Gomez appealed from a district court's second amended judgment revoking his probation and resentencing. Gomez argues the district court abused its discretion in revoking his probation because his probation violations were for drug usage, not sexual activity. The court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Gomez's probation based on finding Gomez used drugs in violation of his probation terms. SeeState v. Causer , 2004 ND 75, ¶ 37, 678 N.W.2d 552 (holding court did not abuse its discretion in revoking probation based on defendant's possession of alcohol in violation of his probation terms). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

¶2[¶2] Gerald W. Vande Walle, C.J.

¶3Jerod E. Tufte

¶4Daniel J. Crothers

¶5Lisa Fair McEvers

¶6Jon J. Jensen

/924/nw2d/87 · .json · Public domain