State v. Jacques’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 2025
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Dothard v. Rawlinson · Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los Angeles · State v. Thurman · State v. Ramirez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silva · State v. Woodard“In reviewing a trial court's decision to admit evidence, we apply several standards of review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Silva · State v. Widdison“Proper authentication does not require conclusive proof but, instead, requires only that the trial court determine that there is 'evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of [a] condition' of fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Woodard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.