924 So. 2d 1176 - State v. Pitre’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Anders v. California · Coker v. Georgia · State v. Dorthey · State v. Sepulvado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the standard for ineffective assistance of counsel set out in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), a reviewing court must reverse a conviction if the defendant establishes that counsel's performance was deficient, and he was prejudiced by the deficiency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fussell“a fifth of Jack Daniels or Evan Williams. When he was questioned by Detective Roberts, he said he was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.