Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 SO2D 333 - State v. Doussan

State v. Doussan’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Boykin v. Alabama · Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the doctrine of ‘law of the case,’ an appellate court will generally refuse to reconsider its own rulings of law on a subsequent appeal in the same case. State v. Doussan, 05-586 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2/14/06) , 924 So.2d 333, 339 , writ denied, 06-608 (La.10/13/06), 939 So.2d 372 .” State v. Bozeman, 06-679, p. 6 (La.App. 5 Cir. 1/30/07), 951 So.2d 1171, 1174 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the officers were justified in conducting a protective sweep of the premises for their own safety, and to prevent the destruction of evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “could not have known whether anyone entered [the studio] before the surveillance began.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.