Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 So. 2d 531 - Jackson v. State

924 So. 2d 531 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Frye v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In deciding whether an improper comment by the prosecutor requires a reversal, the test is whether or not the natural and probable effect of the statement is to create an unjust prejudice against the accused so as to result in a decision influenced by prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In the present case, the State has shown good cause for requesting a continuance because Love was an essential witness, and because Love's failure to appear was not due to any action by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must rely on plain error to raise the assignment on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.