Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 924 SW2D 82 - State v. Burdin

State v. Burdin’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
6
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 2019

22 state decisions

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ashby · Owens v. State · Stiller v. State · State v. Moss · State v. Fletcher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[m]ake appropriate and reasonable restitution to the victim”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[The subsection] cannot be read as granting unfettered authority to the courts to impose punishments which are beyond the bounds of traditional notions of rehabilitation. The consequences of imposing such a condition without the normal safeguards of legislative study and debate are uncertain. Posting the sign in the defendant’s yard would dramatically affect persons other than the defendant and those charged with his supervision. In addition to being novel and somewhat bizarre, compliance with the condition would have consequences in the community, perhaps beneficial, perhaps detrimental, but in any event unforeseen and unpredictable. Though innovative techniques of probation are encouraged to promote the rehabilitation of offenders and the prevention of recidivism, this legislative grant of authority may not be used to usurp the legislative role of defining the nature of punishment which may be imposed. The power to define what shall constitute a criminal offense and to assess punishment for a particular crime is vested in the legislature. [Citations omitted.]” 924 S.W.2d at 87 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]erform, without compensation, services in the community for charitable or governmental agencies”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.