In Re Adner G.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 18 Cal. App. 3d 504 - People v. Jackson · Parker v. Parker · State v. Sivo · State v. Neary · In Re Frances
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(v) Fails to provide the child with a minimum degree of care or proper supervision or guardianship because of his or her unwillingness or inability to do so by situations or conditions such as, but not limited to: social problems, mental incompetency, or the use of a drug, drugs, or alcohol to the extent that the parent or other person responsible for the child's welfare loses his or her ability or is unwilling to properly care for the child[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Kurt H. · In re Sophia M.“findings are entitled to great weight and will not be reversed on appeal unless the trial justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence, or was otherwise clearly wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he clear and convincing standard requires that the fact-finder form a 'clear conviction without hesitancy of the truth of the precise facts in issue.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.