Travis v. Al Lockhart’s Empirical Analysis
925 F.2d 1095 · 1991
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2010
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Mullins Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · Griffin v. Hilke · Porter v. Wainwright · Nash v. Black · Harkins v. Wyrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the state did not raise the [possibility of a] procedural default in the district court or on appeal,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vick v. Al Lockhart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.