United States v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
925 F.2d 1170 · 1991
Citation profile
49 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably United States v. Warshak (2010), United States v. Olano (1995)
49 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Young · Stirone v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“notice-related functions of protecting against unfair surprise, enabling the defendant to prepare for trial and permitting the defendant to plead the indictment as a bar to later prosecutions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'A variance requires reversal only if it prejudices a defendant's substantial rights.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“establish both deficient performance and resulting prejudice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.