Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 925 F.2d 1339 - Ansley v. Heinrich

Ansley v. Heinrich’s Empirical Analysis

925 F.2d 1339 · 1991

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
3
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

34 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Cottrell v. Caldwell (1996), Courson v. McMillian (1991)

34 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

7701991200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Butz v. Economou · Tennessee v. Garner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The defendant public official must first prove that “he was acting within the scope of his discretionary authority when the allegedly wrongful acts occurred.” 2. Once the defendant public official satisfies his burden of moving forward with the evidence, the burden shifts to the plaintiff to show lack of good faith on the defendant’s part. This burden is met by proof demonstrating that the defendant public official’s actions “violated clearly established constitutional law” [or a federal statute].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he Supreme Court's qualified immunity precedent aims at one goal: to keep the public official out of the courtroom, free to exercise discretionary duties under clearly established law without the constant threat of lawsuits.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “an immunity from suit rather than a mere defense to liability [that] is effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.