United States v. Argomaniz’s Empirical Analysis
925 F.2d 1349 · 1991
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Dg Acquisition Corp Dg Corp Dg v. Dabah (1998), 200 W. Va. 312 - In the Interest of Anthony Ray Mc. (1997)
18 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6012 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 26 U.S.C. § 7402 · 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 26 U.S.C. § 7604
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Kastigar v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · Fisher v. United States · United States v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“blanket refusal to produce records or to testify will not support a fifth amendment claim”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The witness is not exonerated from answering merely because he declares that in so doing he would incriminate himself -- his say-so does not of itself establish the hazard of incrimination. It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) To enforce summons. If any person is summoned under the internal revenue laws to appear, to testify, or to produce books, papers, or other data, the district court of the United States for the district in which such person resides or may be found shall have jurisdiction by appropriate process to compel such attendance, testimony, or production of books, papers, or other data.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.