Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

925 F.2d 1456

Docket No. 90-6381.

Harris v. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 5, 1990. Decided Feb. 7, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-07

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Gilbert Jackson v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-02-07

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Gary Lee Harris, appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Gary Lee Harris appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Murray, CA-89-257-AM (E.D.Va. July 25, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/925/f2d/1456 · .json · Public domain