Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

925 F.2d 1457

Docket No. 90-7175.

Frizell Stephens v. R. Muncy

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 4, 1991. Decided Feb. 20, 1991.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1991-02-20

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harris v. Oklahoma · Gordon v. Leeke · Oliphant v. Charlotte Memorial Hosp. and Medical Center

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1991-02-20

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Frizell Stephens appeals from the district court's order dismissing his civil complaint.* Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Stephens v. Muncy, CA-90-1430-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 20, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*

Stephens filed his lawsuit as a habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. However, because Stephens seeks to remedy a denial of access to state courts, we consider his filing as a complaint filed more appropriately pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. See Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 (1978) (liberal construction of pro se pleadings)

/925/f2d/1457 · .json · Public domain